Tag Archives: Christian Discernment

ALTAR AUDIT, Part 15: The Altar of Control

Read Mark 12:13–17

ALSO IN SCRIPTURE
“If we allow him to go on like this, soon everyone will believe in him. Then the Roman army will come and destroy both our Temple and our nation.” (John 11:48 NLT)

Altars reveal what we worship. Some are obvious—raised platforms of stone and flame. Others are quieter, constructed in systems, reputations, loyalties, and assumptions. Lent is a season of holy examination. It calls us to look closely at what we have built, what we defend, and what we trust. In this series, we conduct an audit—not of budgets or buildings, but of allegiances. Lent strips away every false altar until only Christ remains.

A large stone altar sits centered in a modern open courtyard, split by a deep crack running through its middle. The surrounding architecture is symmetrical and still, with a distant city skyline blurred in gray light. Overlaid text reads “ALTAR AUDIT: A New Lenten Devotion Series” and “The Altar of Control,” with “Life-Giving Water Devotions” at the bottom. The atmosphere is cold and controlled, suggesting fractured trust beneath structured systems.
Image: AI-generated using DALL·E and customized by the author. Used with the devotional “The Altar of Control” at Life-Giving Water Devotions.

Part 15: The Altar of Control. It begins like so many conversations do—with a question that seems reasonable enough on the surface. There is no raised voice, no visible confrontation, just a moment offered in public, shaped carefully, placed precisely where it will be heard.

But something is off.

The tone is measured. The setting is controlled. The words are familiar. And yet beneath it all, there is a sense that the answer matters less than what the answer will produce.

Jesus is standing in that space when the question comes: “Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar or not?”

It sounds simple. It is anything but.

Say yes, and you are aligned with empire. Say no, and you are marked as a threat to it. Either way, the outcome has already been calculated. The question is not seeking truth. It is seeking control.

This is where the altar reveals itself.

The altar of control is built when truth is no longer the goal—only outcome.

The brilliance of the trap is how normal it sounds. It does not announce itself as manipulation. It presents as discernment. It uses language that feels faithful, responsible, even necessary. But underneath, the aim is not understanding—it is positioning, exposure, and leverage.

Not every question is asked in good faith.

And Jesus refuses to answer on those terms.

“Give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar, and give to God what belongs to God.”

This is not an endorsement of empire. It is not a command to compliance. It is a refusal to be trapped inside a false framework. The question assumes divided loyalties that can be neatly sorted and controlled. Jesus exposes the assumption itself.

You cannot reduce faithfulness to a category that can be managed. You cannot contain God within the boundaries of political convenience. You cannot force truth into a system designed to protect itself.

In fact, here’s a Biblical interpretive hack: Jesus returns question with question—“Whose image is on this?” Then, “give to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s.” No one could deny the words, but the weight underneath them was equally undeniable. What is Caesar’s, exactly? Not much in the grand scheme of things. What is God’s? Everything—including what Caesar claims.

And just like that, the trap collapses.

But the instinct behind it does not.

Because the altar of control is not confined to one group, one system, or one moment. It appears anywhere truth becomes secondary to outcome, anywhere questions are shaped not to learn, but to corner.

We know this instinct.

Where we ask questions to trap, not learn.
Where we debate to win, not discern.
Where we use Scripture to control, not reveal.

It shows up in religious spaces. It shows up in political spaces. It shows up in conversations where the goal is no longer understanding, but victory—where the outcome matters more than the truth itself.

And often, it is justified.

In John’s Gospel, the reasoning is made explicit: better to control the situation than to risk losing everything. Better to contain the disruption than to let it spread. Control is framed as wisdom. Preservation is framed as necessity.

That is how the altar is built.

Not through open rebellion, but through careful justification. Not through obvious corruption, but through quiet calculation. Not through abandoning faith, but through reshaping it into something manageable.

And Jesus will not participate in that.

Jesus does not play the game. Jesus does not accept the premise. Jesus does not allow truth to be reduced to something that can be leveraged for advantage.

Instead, Jesus reveals something deeper: that what belongs to God cannot be negotiated, controlled, or contained by the systems we build.

Which brings the question back to us.

Are we seeking truth…or control?

Because the difference is not always visible at first. It often sounds the same. It often feels the same. It often even uses the same words.

But one leads to surrender.
The other leads to power.

And only one of those leads to God.

THOUGHT OF THE DAY
The altar of control is built wherever truth is shaped to secure outcomes instead of reveal God.

PRAYER
God, expose the places where I seek control more than truth. Where I have shaped questions to protect my own outcomes, bring honesty. Where I have used your word to manage rather than listen, bring humility. Teach me to seek what is true, even when it unsettles what I would rather keep. Amen.


Devotion written by Rev. Todd R. Lattig with the assistance of ChatGPT (OpenAI).

Sacred Signs of Subversion, Part 28: Inverted Cross

Read 1 Corinthians 1:18–19

ALSO IN SCRIPTURE
“‘I tell you the truth, when you were young, you were able to do as you liked; you dressed yourself and went wherever you wanted to go. But when you are old, you will stretch out your hands, and others will dress you and take you where you don’t want to go.’ Jesus said this to let him know by what kind of death he would glorify God.” (John 21:18–19, NLT)

Symbols carry memory and meaning far beyond words. The Church has always leaned on them—sometimes hidden in plain sight, sometimes dismissed or distorted. Yet the most powerful symbols are those that subvert the world’s expectations and draw us back to the radical heart of the Gospel. In this series, we’ll look closer at the sacred signs that shock, unsettle, and ultimately call us deeper into Christ.

A simple, weathered wooden cross hangs upside down from a piece of twine against a softly lit, neutral background. The wood is rough and aged, with visible grain and small nails at the center. The image is quiet and minimal, inviting reflection rather than shock.
Image: AI-generated using DALL·E and customized by the author. Used with the devotional “Sacred Signs of Subversion, Part 28: Inverted Cross” at Life-Giving Water Devotions.

Part 28: Inverted Cross. Let’s begin with what we were told. The inverted cross is a sign of evil. A mark of Satan. A deliberate mockery of Christ. A symbol to fear, reject, and condemn.

Long before cable news, social media, or culture wars, symbols were already being distorted through fear, polemic, and power. And few symbols have been so thoroughly misreported as the inverted cross.

The origin of the inverted cross has nothing to do with rebellion or blasphemy. According to early Christian tradition, the Apostle Peter—condemned to death by crucifixion—asked to be crucified upside down, declaring himself unworthy to die in the same manner as Christ. Whether one treats this account as historical fact or sacred tradition, its meaning is unmistakable. The inverted cross began as an act of humility, not defiance. It signaled reversal, not rejection. It proclaimed that Christ alone stands upright at the center of faith.

Over time, the symbol also became associated with the seat of St. Peter, the first bishop of Rome. Again, this is tradition, not Scripture—but it matters. The symbol was never secret. It was never sinister. It was embedded in the Church’s memory as a reminder that leadership in Christ’s name begins not with power, but with surrender.

So how did such a powerful sign against faux spiritual performance become a performance of evil proportions? How did a sign of humility become a harrowing omen of heresy? How did a symbol that once represented humble, servant leadership, become the epitome of of enduring evil?

The first major corruption of the symbol did not come from artists or occultists. It came from theology shaped by fear.

During the Protestant Reformation, the office of the Pope—understood as the successor to Peter—was increasingly demonized. Polemics hardened. Accusations escalated. The Bishop of Rome was labeled the Antichrist, the Beast of Revelation, the embodiment of evil itself. In that climate, anything associated with Peter’s authority was cast in shadow. The inverted cross did not change its meaning; it inherited the suspicion attached to the office it symbolized.

This was bad theology. The term “antichrist” appears not in Revelation, but in the Johannine epistles, where it refers not to a singular figure, but to a persistent spirit that opposes Christ. Likewise, the Beast in Revelation does not represent a church office or a pope. It represents empire—all systems of domination that demand allegiance, participation, and worship. But once fear takes hold, symbols lose their context, and nuance becomes collateral damage. This does not mean church offices are immune from empire; it means they are judged by it, too, whenever power eclipses humility and allegiance shifts from Christ to control.

The second major demonization arrived centuries later, in a very different form. The rise of the Moral Majority, the Evangelical Right, and the Satanic Panic of the 1970s through the 1990s transformed cultural anxiety into political theology. Symbols were no longer studied; they were weaponized. Artists, musicians, creatives, and visionaries who resisted religious political populism were branded dangerous, godless, or demonic. The inverted cross became a convenient prop in a narrative designed to dehumanize dissent.

Here, intentional provocation entered the picture. Figures like Anton LaVey and the Church of Satan did not “discover” the inverted cross—they exploited its misunderstood reputation. The goal was not theological clarity, but cultural disruption. Shock was the point. Fear was the lever. Scaring the puritans was the method. And in many cases, it worked. The symbol’s meaning was further obscured, not because it was powerful, but because it was useful.

Art, media, and rebellion compounded the confusion. Some artists leaned into the inversion as a way of pushing back against the moral purity culture of the 1950s, American Puritanism, and the suffocating marriage of religion and politics. Others adopted the symbol with little interest in its history at all. The result is a cultural echo chamber where almost no one remembers what the symbol actually meant—and almost everyone is certain they know what it stands for.

Scripture offers a corrective.

“The message of the cross is foolish to those who are headed for destruction,” Paul writes, “but we who are being saved know it is the very power of God.” The cross has always been misunderstood. It has always been scandalous. It has always threatened systems that equate strength with dominance and wisdom with control. The inverted cross simply extends that scandal. It reminds us that the Gospel turns our hierarchies upside down.

In its truest sense, the inverted cross does not mock Christ. It dethrones us. It exposes our obsession with appearing righteous, powerful, and certain. It calls the Church back to humility, reminding us that following Christ often looks like surrender, not spectacle.

The danger is not the symbol. The danger is how easily we allow fear to rewrite meaning, and how quick we are to “other” what we fear in those we don’t like or understand. Now THAT is truly Satanic.

THOUGHT OF THE DAY
When fear distorts a symbol, it often reveals more about our power structures than about the symbol itself.

PRAYER
God of wisdom and truth, free us from the fear that clouds our discernment. Teach us to look deeper than appearances and to resist the stories that power tells us to keep us afraid. Turn our hearts away from false certainty and back toward the humility of Christ. May we learn again what it means to follow the cross—not as a weapon, but as a way. Amen.


Devotion written by Rev. Todd R. Lattig with the assistance of ChatGPT (OpenAI).