Read Luke 6:20-26
ALSO IN SCRIPTURE
“Listen to me, dear brothers and sisters. Hasn’t God chosen the poor in this world to be rich in faith? Aren’t they the ones who will inherit the Kingdom he promised to those who love him?” (James 2:5 NLT)
Altars reveal what we worship. Some are obvious—raised platforms of stone and flame. Others are quieter, constructed in systems, reputations, loyalties, and assumptions. Lent is a season of holy examination. It calls us to look closely at what we have built, what we defend, and what we trust. In this series, we conduct an audit—not of budgets or buildings, but of allegiances. Lent strips away every false altar until only Christ remains.

Part 10: The Altar of Preference. It’s easy to hear “blessed are the poor” and quietly translate it into something more comfortable—something spiritual, something distant, something we can agree with without changing much. But Luke doesn’t give us that distance. He places Jesus on level ground, among the people, where these words land differently.
What we often call the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew’s Gospel appears differently in Luke. Here, it is known as the Sermon on the Plain. And that difference is not incidental. In Matthew, Jesus goes up the mountain, sits, and teaches his disciples. In Luke, Jesus comes down, stands on level ground, and speaks among a large crowd—disciples, the sick, the poor, the desperate, all gathered together. What is said here is not abstract or removed—it is social, embodied, and immediate.
And even the words themselves shift. In Matthew, the blessing is for the “poor in spirit.” In Luke, it is simply the poor. Not a category that could be internalized or spiritualized, but a reality standing right in front of them. A reality standing in front of us all.
“Blessed are you who are poor… Woe to you who are rich.”
There is no softening here. No easy reframing that lets us keep everything exactly as it is. This is not an abstract principle. It is a reordering, and it cuts directly against the way we operate. Why? Because we do not build around the poor.
We serve them. We support them. We minister to them. We create programs, organize drives, and mobilize volunteers. Much of this is necessary. Much of it is good. People rely on it. It matters.
But it is also worth asking what kind of world our systems are actually forming.
We don’t reject the poor…we just build systems around them. We tell them who they are and what they need.
They are not the center. They are the recipients.
And over time, that distinction begins to matter more than we realize.
Because what we call ministry can slowly become preference. Not maliciously. Not intentionally. But structurally. We build in ways that are sustainable for us, manageable for us, comfortable for us. We decide what is possible, what is realistic, what is wise. Who fits the mold enough to be helped, and just what help we can give.
And in doing so, we may never notice that the system itself remains untouched.
Or worse—what we build around the “least of these” can quietly become part of the prison.
Not liberation. Not the release proclaimed in Luke 4. But a managed, contained version of care that keeps everything functioning just well enough to continue as it is.
Jesus does something different.
Jesus heals who is in front of him. Jesus feeds who is hungry. Jesus restores who is broken. But Jesus also announces a Kingdom that does not simply patch the existing system—it overturns it. The poor are not recipients in that Kingdom. They are centered. Blessed, not because poverty is good, but because God’s reign is breaking in among those the world has pushed aside.
That is the inversion.
And it exposes something deeper in us.
Preference is not always about what we like. It is about what we are willing to reorganize our lives around. It is about who we place at the center—and who we keep at the edges, even while serving them.
Even in the Church.
Especially in the Church.
This is not a call to abandon the work we are doing. It is a call to examine the structure in which we are doing it. To ask whether our ministry reflects the Kingdom Jesus proclaims—or simply makes the current world more bearable.
Because one sustains.
The other transforms.
And those are not the same thing.
THOUGHT OF THE DAY
The Kingdom of God does not ask us to serve the poor from a distance—it calls us to rebuild the world with them at the center.PRAYER
God, open our eyes to the ways we have mistaken preference for faithfulness. Give us courage to see clearly, humility to listen deeply, and wisdom to build differently. Reorder our lives, our churches, and our systems so that they reflect your Kingdom—not our comfort. Lead us from maintenance into transformation. Amen.
Devotion written by Rev. Todd R. Lattig with the assistance of ChatGPT (OpenAI).
What does it mean to be elite? The word, no doubt, has many different meanings for each of us. As a football fan, I think of elite in terms of superior skill and athleticism. I remember when NY Giants quarterback Eli Manning was being asked if he thought he were an “elite” quarterback. In that sense, the question was asking him if he thought his skills were at a level that was above most quarterbacks in the league. But being elite does not just refer to success; rather, it also means being among the extremely privileged. It means being a part of a select group of people who are superior in ability and/or qualities, such as success, status, skill, wealth, and other such things.
Part 205: Poor Widow. If there is one thing that is consistent about all accounts of Jesus in the Gospels, it is that he consistently showed favor and deference to those who were “the least of these.” We need to be careful in how we read/hear that. I am not saying that “the least of these” were always the poor, the homeless, the oppressed, etc. To read that into it would be to expose our own biases. Some of the richest people can be “the least of these”.
One of the brilliant things that Matthew’s account of the Beatitudes brings to the table is that it provides us with a deeper and more profound understanding of the heart of Christ’s teachings. It is widely believed by scholars that the four Gospels drew the words and teachings of Jesus from the hypothetical “Q” source. It is nicknamed “Q” because it comes from the German word “Quelle”, which literally means “source.” I say that this source is “hypothetical” because there is no archaelogial proof or record of it, however, Matthew and Luke seem to have been utilizing the same source material (both “Q” and the Gospel of Mark) for their Gospels. What’s more, they were doing so independent of one another, as each of the four Gospels were written in different places and times.
In the Gospel According to Matthew, Jesus, with his disciples gathered around him, stood up before a crowd of people and began to teach them. “Blessed are the poor in Spirit,” he began, projecting his voice for the multitude to hear, “for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven.” The crowd was in shock as Jesus uttered these words and, no doubt, the sounds of gasps and whispers could be heard moving from mouths to ears throughout the crowd.

